Seti is 10 X faster with Cuda OpenCL, why not Enigma ? |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Seti is 10 X faster with Cuda OpenCL, why not Enigma ?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Seti is 10 X faster with Cuda OpenCL, why not Enigma ? | |
| ID: 2019 · Rating: 0 · rate:
| |
|
I've seen this sort of post in a lot of BOINC forums. It's all down to the maths behind the calculations. A good explanation is in this post: | |
| ID: 2020 · Rating: 0 · rate:
| |
|
http://developer.nvidia.com/category/zone/cuda-zone | |
| ID: 2093 · Rating: 0 · rate:
| |
|
Did you read the thread you were linked to, or are you only trying to annoy, without reading or figuring out what project does what and why they chose to do it that way? | |
| ID: 2094 · Rating: 0 · rate:
| |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Seti is 10 X faster with Cuda OpenCL, why not Enigma ?
